Maslow had it all wrong, air and creativity in a dead heat.
This is the conversation I can't have with anyone, they go silent.
Saturday, December 8, 2018
Selfportrait
Labels:
abstract,
art,
art history,
artist,
conte crayon,
contemporary,
drawing,
drawings,
earth,
expressionist,
figurative,
healing,
modern,
new figuration,
nick thabit,
original,
painter,
painting,
self portrait
Sunday, November 18, 2018
Mitchell Algus, first among art dealers.
I used to stop in at this guy's gallery when it was in Chelsea. He'd always be sitting there reading, perhaps looking for the next neglected artist.
The concept of a 'hero' in today's art world seems irrelevant; except for him.
copied and pasted from:
The concept of a 'hero' in today's art world seems irrelevant; except for him.
copied and pasted from:
‘Everybody Owes Him a Debt of Gratitude’: How Mitchell Algus Became New York’s Most Beloved, Least Successful Art Dealer
Mitchell Algus gave some of the greatest artists working today their first shows. So why does nobody know his name?
The celebrated art dealer Mitchell Algus marked the 25th anniversary of his gallery last year. But no one seemed to notice.
That’s probably because he didn’t actually get around to commemorating the anniversary until now, a year later, with a series of group exhibitions that highlight some of the artists he’s shown over the years, often long before they achieved fame elsewhere. The list includes many names who are now regarded as boundary-pushing pioneers of contemporary art: Barkley Hendricks, Betty Tompkins, Martha Wilson, Judith Bernstein, Joan Semmel, and Lee Lozano, among others.
The consummate underdog, Algus is used to being overlooked and off schedule. He has never hired staff and rarely sells the work he shows. “I don’t think the collectors ever understood what I did, until the artist goes to Hauser & Wirth or Mary Boone,” he says—as was the case of Lozano and Bernstein, respectively.
In an art market that increasingly benefits mega-dealers but has never been less hospitable to smaller outfits, Algus represents a vanishing breed: a gallerist who is dedicated to finding work that others have dismissed or ignored, without interest in a major payoff. “His heart, and his history, are, always were, truly in it,” the New York Times art critic Holland Cotter tells artnet News. “He’s a driven and tender archaeologist.”
Algus has managed to stay afloat for 25 years, through multiple booms and busts. But the current climate has left him feeling more discouraged than ever.
Working Double Duty
For 23 years, Algus supported himself and the gallery by teaching science at a Queens public high school, opening the space up on nights and weekends. But the day job, from which he retired in 2014, afforded him the independence to pursue the cerebral, often unprofitable shows he enjoys most.
“Mitchell is an iconoclast, and there is usually no reward for that,” says curator Bob Nickas. “Neither is there any appreciation from the blue-chip galleries that have profited from all the legwork and brain-work he has done over the years.”
Many of the artists Algus championed are currently enjoying unprecedented market and critical acclaim. Bernstein was recently the subject of a solo exhibition at New York’s Drawing Center; Hendricks figures prominently in Tate Modern’s traveling exhibition “Soul of a Nation: Art in the Age of Black Power” and the Prospect.4 Biennial in New Orleans. A number of others were included in a special section dedicated to explicit art made by women at Frieze London. Algus, for his part, says he couldn’t afford to participate.
“Everybody owes him a debt of gratitude,” Cotter says. “Most important were the entire careers—particularly careers of women artists—he helped restore and reposition just by paying attention.”
Foot Traffic Falling
Although Algus has made some peace with the financial realities of his business, he is suddenly confronting a new kind of deficit he never imagined: gallery-goers. Lately, he considers it a good day if three people come by his Lower East Side space. “The audience is the real worry now. Why do shows if nobody else is coming?”
Algus blames the rise of art fairs for dominating not just the market, but also the audience. Fairs are “a death sentence,” he says. “For galleries that aren’t Gagosian or Hauser & Wirth, nobody expects to make money; you expect to pay the fine of the booth for the crime of going to the art fair. It’s the only place you see these collectors.”
For Algus, the present moment is probably the closest he’s come to considering closing his doors for good. Losing the legendary space would be a blow not only to its fans, but also to the broader art ecosystem, which would would lose an eye at the margins that has consistently brought to light artists that would otherwise be ignored or rejected.
“It’s a rarefied group of people who go see Mitchell Algus shows,” says Jay Sanders, executive director of the nonprofit gallery Artists Space. But from those small shows, major careers have sprung. “Look at Tompkins, Lozano—he was the person to find the work in their attic. He’s a secret source,” Sanders says.
A Long Road to Art
Algus was born in 1954 and grew up in Brooklyn and Long Island. His father was a dentist who loved art and often took his son to galleries in Manhattan. Algus went on to receive a PhD in physical geography from McGill University in Montreal, doing his field research in the Canadian Arctic.
He maintained his interest in art throughout, but when he took an art class in college and got a B, he gave up the idea of pursuing it academically. “Why am I going to do something and get a B? Forget it,” he says. So he focused instead on science, but still spent hours in the art library poring over old issues of Art International and Artforum.
In the mid-1980s, he moved to New York City and started to make his own artwork. He dismisses his practice now as “just fooling around,” but he showed several times with Pat Hearn, a leading dealer in the East Village at the time. “He was making these fascinating sculptures that looked like amoebas but were made out of upholstery material with fringe and buttons,” says the artist Jack Pierson, who befriended Algus and later went on to curate a show at his gallery in 2003. “It was incredible work.”
In 1989, Algus partnered with his friend Licha Jimenez to run her gallery in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. He quit making his own work and focused on the space full time, recruiting historical figures such as Robert Mallary and Harold Stevenson to show there. In 1992, he opened his own gallery on Thompson Street in SoHo, alongside such up-and-coming dealers as Gavin Brown and Friedrich Petzel. “David Zwirner opened up a couple blocks away,” Algus said, trailing off. “…Two separate trajectories.”
Algus debuted his new gallery with a single painting, Harold Stevenson’s 40-foot-long male nude, New Adam (1962), which wrapped around the gallery in several panels. “Sensational, and until then, as far as I know, completely forgotten,” Holland Cotter says of the work, which is now in the collection of the Guggenheim. “It was clear right away that Mitchell was looking at times and places and kinds of art no one had looked at for ages.”
Great Discoveries
A few years later, in 1998, Algus presented a solo show of work by the then-unknown painter Lee Lozano, who was suffering from cancer and would die the next year. He tried to sell her drawings for $1,500, but “I couldn’t do it,” he says. After Nickas, then a curator at MoMA PS1, saw the show, he decided to do a survey of Lozano’s work at the museum. Soon thereafter, Hauser & Wirth started representing Lozano’s estate and those drawings suddenly cost $65,000—”the same drawings,” Algus says.
Algus’s career is full of moments like this: discoveries he made before the rest of the world was quite ready for them. The painter Betty Tompkins hadn’t had a solo show in 15 years when the art critic Jerry Saltz passed Algus along some slides of her monumental “Fuck Paintings,” depicting genitalia in photorealistic detail. Algus offered her a show in 2002.
“He picked me up and gave me a chance when nobody would breathe in my direction,” Tompkins says. “He really did pick me up off the street.” Those early paintings can now fetch upwards of $650,000. At the time, however, Algus had a tough time selling them to anyone except a few adventuresome collectors, including the artist Robert Gober.
“When I saw the Betty Tompkins paintings I had no doubt that they were consequential and that I’d like to own one,” says Gober, who bought one of the works from that first show and has since donated it to the Brooklyn Museum. “Mitchell has a great eye.”
The gallery’s direction took a sharp turn in 2010 when Algus entered into a tumultuous business partnership with dealer Amy Greenspon, the daughter of art collector William Stuart Greenspon. With her connections and his erudite taste, it seemed like their collaboration could be a serendipitous case of opposites attracting. But it was not. “As with most partnerships, the people who have the money have the gallery,” Algus says. “I got to do some good shows but it wasn’t my gallery.” The pair went their separate ways in 2015.
That year, Algus reopened on his own in the Lower East Side. He is still there, staffing the desk himself, five days a week. It may take a bit of legwork to seek him out, but those who do find it worth the trouble. “He always chats, he has a lot of patience for artists, and loves to share the information he’s acquired,” Pierson says.
But while a lot of people root for the underdog, few, it turns out, show up to its second-floor gallery on an out-of-the-way stretch of Delancey Street. Sanders notes: “His new space is great but, like him, it’s hidden in plain sight.”
Not quite:
GALLERY (Exhibitions, Information)132 Delancey St, 2nd fl, New York 10002
Not quite:
GALLERY (Exhibitions, Information)132 Delancey St, 2nd fl, New York 10002
email: office@mitchellalgusgallery.com
tel: 516-639-4918
Wednesday-Sunday, noon-6 pm
Friday, October 5, 2018
Angelina Gualdoni
Dusty Dusky 2010 oil and acrylic on canvas 47" x 52"
where are you? me? at?
|
Opening The Gates 2011 acrylic on canvas 47" x 52" Beautiful. thank you, thank you. |
Pile 2007 oil and acrylic on canvas 48" x 60"
Sorry to be so subjective. Finally this, an entry into her earlier works, more of the mind than of the essence, but all most agreeable to this viewer. Severely underpopulated future (dystopian? utopian if you're a misanthrope) landscapes, deserted malls, empty spaces of greater Brasilia; very peaceful, well-wrought solitude by an excellent painter.
I won't post them here but by all means check out Radiant Halflife, Dead Malls, Brasilia, Happenings, and Demo.
Let her sue.
|
Sunday, July 22, 2018
Thursday, March 8, 2018
Time To Surf
Labels:
abstract,
art,
art history,
artist,
contemporary,
existentialism,
expressionist,
figurative,
healing,
mixed media,
modern,
neo-expressionist,
new figuration,
nick thabit,
original,
painter,
painting,
surf,
surfing
Saturday, March 3, 2018
"Transformative Space" at August Wilson Center, Pittsburgh
A
long overdue consideration of Black art not as an expression of
victimization but as triumph over America's "anti-culture" (meaning, art
is dead here, to most people). Magnificent stuff, and you get Bob
Thompson!
|
Summit Jack Whitten 1998 mixed media on canvas 84" x 73" |
Info from the August Wilson Center:
In short: runs till April 1st, 980 Liberty Avenue, no admission fee listed but you can call and check: 412-339-1011
Sunday, February 25, 2018
TV Watcher
Labels:
abstract,
addiction,
art,
art history,
artist,
contemporary,
expressionist,
figurative,
media,
modern,
new figuration,
nick thabit,
original,
painter,
painting,
television,
tube,
tv,
watcher,
watching
Saturday, February 24, 2018
Earth Healing 4
Earth Healing 4 8/2017 oil on canvas 30" x 24" |
Finally this is online. The developing idea of the Earth Healing series is, I will do ~24 of them, and hang them in a room encircling the viewer, about 6-8" between them. The viewer will become the Solar Entity, watching the Earth revolving around him/her. I will call it Earth Orbit Room (or Solar Healing room? the healing will emanate from you). Serial, interactive, installation art, yuck! Me and my big ideas..
Labels:
abstract,
art,
art history,
artist,
contemporary,
earth,
expressionist,
figurative,
healing,
modern,
neo-expressionist,
new figuration,
nick thabit,
original,
painter,
painting,
planet,
space
Sunday, February 18, 2018
VENUS series: No. 1
VENUS: Olympus/Night 2017 oil on canvas 20" x 16" |
This is the first picture of the VENUS series, don't know why I started but I'm determined to finish it; a series is kind of a trap. You can only exhibit it once, if someone buys a picture integral to the concept: like this one.
Why Venus? She rules my life and yours; every man wants her and every woman wants to be her. Nice line for a perfume, but I'm a painter. I've got about four of this series in progress and am waiting for more ideas. The concept such as it is, is Venus' place into my life in this century (how a gallerist would find that interesting I don't know). 'Birth' takes place in my childhood bedroom, sort of, but I'm leery of making jokes on the time/space dichotomies.
Venus is here summiting Mount Olympus in the middle of the night. This is the one canvas in my life where the initial picture in my mind of what it could look like, at the end it happened! I gave up half way through, you can't imagine my surprise. Am I an artist?
Labels:
abstract,
art,
art history,
artist,
contemporary,
earth,
expressionist,
figurative,
goddess,
healing,
modern,
myth,
new figuration,
nick thabit,
olympus,
original,
painter,
painting,
venus
Friday, February 16, 2018
Photography in the ICU: condition stable
I was going to mention at the end of my 'wrong altar' piece, in parentheses: photographers seem to search out the cliche.
I'm seriously disappointed in almost all the 'art' photography I see. Take your pick among slice-of-life kids with guns and needles, blank-faced rich kids in a waking coma, empty landscapes that seem determined not to evoke an emotion (verboten in the 'postmodern' art world; emotion is seen as 'naive'; authenticity a hopelessly outdated concept. Admittedly the challenge of authenticity is greater than ever but no one wants to step up to the plate; I think that's what's missing from today's art), hypermarchés from ceiling height with every single item on sale, people at a nightclub, dreamlike tableaus from some alt-Hollywood, people from 'marginal' communities in full frontal (do you really want to copy television?), pseudo-pornography determined not to turn people on but to be taken 'seriously'... the list goes on.
I'm sure you know who/what I'm talking about. The problem in each seems to be the same: photographers tend not to put forth their own vision, but rather what they think an audience will respond to. It's a bit of a crowd-pleasing element that I don't think belongs there. Is it because they are insecure about an art form that basically requires only that you point and shoot? If so, they are missing the point (no pun intended, please); with such an immediate capture, the demand of this form is immediacy, not the opposite. The demand is for intuition, spirited emotion (define it how you will), daring, engagement with life, not thoughts about it; Zen.
This I think is the province, the challenge of photography, but those who really engage with it don't seem to have a chance in the big galleries; as if staging a shot were a sign of seriousness. Like, I have a camera too buddy. I shoot pictures out an' about, what of it? Is it a failure of the curators, gallery owners, not to be able to discern to good, the genius, from the bad, the random? The charge on the gate-keepers is pretty hefty, admittedly. I would not want to sift through the many thousands of photographs taken on the fly purporting to be the ultimate, the transcendent, etc. But the state of photography pretty well encapsulates the sad state of the art world today; an eschewing of the 'authentic' in favor of, well, you call it: the proper bourgeois aesthetic distance, the jaded search for a more elegant perversity, enough irony to keep 'reality' at a safe distance hahaha. Okay I'll stop.
Whatever happened to the practice of finding, as the Buddhists would put it, the 'jewel in the manure'? Where is the visual equivalent of the Blues, as a universal language, not limited to Americans or to any class, race, or category? Where are the Zen photographers? They're out there, but they're not going to make anybody any money. They're too good. As with so many things...
If you think I've missed something/someone, let me know. I know I've taken a really harsh view of photography but I see the same thing (almost) every time. I'd be happy to be proved wrong.
I'm seriously disappointed in almost all the 'art' photography I see. Take your pick among slice-of-life kids with guns and needles, blank-faced rich kids in a waking coma, empty landscapes that seem determined not to evoke an emotion (verboten in the 'postmodern' art world; emotion is seen as 'naive'; authenticity a hopelessly outdated concept. Admittedly the challenge of authenticity is greater than ever but no one wants to step up to the plate; I think that's what's missing from today's art), hypermarchés from ceiling height with every single item on sale, people at a nightclub, dreamlike tableaus from some alt-Hollywood, people from 'marginal' communities in full frontal (do you really want to copy television?), pseudo-pornography determined not to turn people on but to be taken 'seriously'... the list goes on.
I'm sure you know who/what I'm talking about. The problem in each seems to be the same: photographers tend not to put forth their own vision, but rather what they think an audience will respond to. It's a bit of a crowd-pleasing element that I don't think belongs there. Is it because they are insecure about an art form that basically requires only that you point and shoot? If so, they are missing the point (no pun intended, please); with such an immediate capture, the demand of this form is immediacy, not the opposite. The demand is for intuition, spirited emotion (define it how you will), daring, engagement with life, not thoughts about it; Zen.
This I think is the province, the challenge of photography, but those who really engage with it don't seem to have a chance in the big galleries; as if staging a shot were a sign of seriousness. Like, I have a camera too buddy. I shoot pictures out an' about, what of it? Is it a failure of the curators, gallery owners, not to be able to discern to good, the genius, from the bad, the random? The charge on the gate-keepers is pretty hefty, admittedly. I would not want to sift through the many thousands of photographs taken on the fly purporting to be the ultimate, the transcendent, etc. But the state of photography pretty well encapsulates the sad state of the art world today; an eschewing of the 'authentic' in favor of, well, you call it: the proper bourgeois aesthetic distance, the jaded search for a more elegant perversity, enough irony to keep 'reality' at a safe distance hahaha. Okay I'll stop.
Whatever happened to the practice of finding, as the Buddhists would put it, the 'jewel in the manure'? Where is the visual equivalent of the Blues, as a universal language, not limited to Americans or to any class, race, or category? Where are the Zen photographers? They're out there, but they're not going to make anybody any money. They're too good. As with so many things...
If you think I've missed something/someone, let me know. I know I've taken a really harsh view of photography but I see the same thing (almost) every time. I'd be happy to be proved wrong.
Wednesday, February 14, 2018
Blame De Kooning
I just realized, in thinking how I'd not posted anything in quite some time, and of how exhausting it was trying (and failing) to post that perfect thing, that I'd lost track of the original idea of this blog: to have a conversation, if only with that special someone I greet everyday in the mirror.
Today I want to say that I've been painting, and I finally got back paintings I did years ago in a big box from out-of-state. I will post them all (except for those few I paint over), I've been touching them up. A 90% finished painting is the kiss of death, that last 10% is a quagmire, a pit swallowing all good sense, discernment, discrimination, restraint. Never 'fix'. Wait. Preferably ten years.
98% finished is even worse. Luckily I couldn't get my hands on these for the last year-and-a-half so they were safe. My latest work on the theme of Venus has me flummoxed. Unable to continue, I made a series of drawings on the subject of Woman, after De Kooning. I don't know if it quite worked for him, but you see a definite change over the years from the angry scary overwhelming women to the happy joyous overwhelming women. Women that are more like water.
My women hold pistols, ride nuclear bombs, entertain 'guests', call us from beyond the stars, and take part in theatrical productions (Pierrot Lunaire).
Oh what the hell here they are:
What is my problem? Hopeless romantic. I'm still in the position of not having conversations with anyone; the curse of the visually-oriented. On a drive I'll point out an interesting sight to someone. Silence. I was much relieved to read The Private Lives of the Impressionists, to know of men and women who went on at length about things they saw, as if their appearance was of great import! This is how I am. I could appeal to people's sense of Feng Shui, in that disagreeable appearances can cause illness, and agreeable ones health, or simply become an architect or a landscaper. Ha.
People don't care what effect their environment is having on them. They want relief, instant relief, as they don't feel there's any hope of improving their environment at any level. In cities it's all too true, in the country they can look out of doors although if born there, perhaps none too impressed.
Explaining to people why art matters is simple: it's exactly because you can't change your environment, your world, your politics, your (or their) situation, that art is important. It's all you've got left. Art you can change, create, revise, etc. to suit your needs, yourself, your heart.
But our (N. American) culture's not about that. This was considered worthless in the year 2000, but four people disagreed, and saved it. You can disagree too.
The background I first used for this blog:
(and thankfully stopped using as no one could read the text), is an old painting I did of Herbert Huncke, the first writer who was called, 'beat' (his own idea).
It's after this photo:
A compelling figure, no? You perhaps don't know him, one story here.
Art matters because of people like him.
Today I want to say that I've been painting, and I finally got back paintings I did years ago in a big box from out-of-state. I will post them all (except for those few I paint over), I've been touching them up. A 90% finished painting is the kiss of death, that last 10% is a quagmire, a pit swallowing all good sense, discernment, discrimination, restraint. Never 'fix'. Wait. Preferably ten years.
98% finished is even worse. Luckily I couldn't get my hands on these for the last year-and-a-half so they were safe. My latest work on the theme of Venus has me flummoxed. Unable to continue, I made a series of drawings on the subject of Woman, after De Kooning. I don't know if it quite worked for him, but you see a definite change over the years from the angry scary overwhelming women to the happy joyous overwhelming women. Women that are more like water.
My women hold pistols, ride nuclear bombs, entertain 'guests', call us from beyond the stars, and take part in theatrical productions (Pierrot Lunaire).
Oh what the hell here they are:
Marauder 8.5" x 5.5" mixed media on paper Woman with Hat 2017 ink on paper 5.5" x 8.5" |
Manhattan Apartment 5.5" x 8.5" mixed media on paper |
3 Women 5.5" x 8.5" mixed media on paper |
STAR-MA 8.5" x 5.5" mixed media on paper |
Pierrot As A Girl 5.5" x 8.5" mixed media on paper |
What is my problem? Hopeless romantic. I'm still in the position of not having conversations with anyone; the curse of the visually-oriented. On a drive I'll point out an interesting sight to someone. Silence. I was much relieved to read The Private Lives of the Impressionists, to know of men and women who went on at length about things they saw, as if their appearance was of great import! This is how I am. I could appeal to people's sense of Feng Shui, in that disagreeable appearances can cause illness, and agreeable ones health, or simply become an architect or a landscaper. Ha.
People don't care what effect their environment is having on them. They want relief, instant relief, as they don't feel there's any hope of improving their environment at any level. In cities it's all too true, in the country they can look out of doors although if born there, perhaps none too impressed.
Explaining to people why art matters is simple: it's exactly because you can't change your environment, your world, your politics, your (or their) situation, that art is important. It's all you've got left. Art you can change, create, revise, etc. to suit your needs, yourself, your heart.
But our (N. American) culture's not about that. This was considered worthless in the year 2000, but four people disagreed, and saved it. You can disagree too.
The background I first used for this blog:
(and thankfully stopped using as no one could read the text), is an old painting I did of Herbert Huncke, the first writer who was called, 'beat' (his own idea).
It's after this photo:
It seems I'll also have to do this one, and a bit better:
A compelling figure, no? You perhaps don't know him, one story here.
Art matters because of people like him.
Thursday, February 1, 2018
Woman at the Sea
Woman at the Sea 5/2016 8" x 10" oil on canvas |
I really didn't try to make this. It was an abstract painting, she just showed up.
This is the first painting I made where I really thought, 'this is Art', as opposed to 'artistic'. Maybe the 1000th, but this time, there was 'meaning'.
I've been 'final' touching up some paintings from years past, more to come.
Labels:
abstract,
art,
art history,
artist,
beach,
contemporary,
expressionist,
figurative,
impasto,
knife painting,
modern,
new figuration,
nick thabit,
original,
painter,
painting,
palette knife,
sea,
seashore,
woman
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)